in Russia in 1905 and educated there, she immigrated to the United
States after graduating from the university, where she studied
history, politics, philosophy, and literature. Rand had always found
capitalism and the individualism of the United States a welcome
alternative to the corrupt and negative socialism of Russia. Upon
becoming proficient in English and establishing herself as a writer in
the U.S., she became a passionate advocate of her philosophy,
Objectivism.
Rand's philosophy is in the Aristotelian tradition, with that
tradition's emphasis upon metaphysical naturalism, empirical reason in
epistemology, and self-realization in ethics. Objectivism is rational
self-interest and self-responsibility – the idea that no man is any
other man's slave. The virtues of her philosophy are principled
policies based on rational assessment: rationality, productiveness,
honesty (in order to rationally make the best decisions we must be
privy to the facts), integrity, independence, justice, and pride.
Her political philosophy is in the classical liberal tradition, with
that tradition's emphasis upon individualism, the constitutional
protection of individual rights to life, liberty, and property, and
limited government.
She wrote both technical and popular works of philosophy, and she
presented her philosophy in both fictional and non-fictional forms,
the most philosophically complete and popular of which are Atlas
Shrugged and Fountainhead. Her philosophy has influenced several
generations of academics and public intellectuals, as well as having
had widespread popular appeal.
1. Life
Ayn Rand's life was often as colorful as those of her heroes in her
best-selling novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Rand first
made her name as a novelist, publishing We the Living in 1936, The
Fountainhead in 1943, and her magnum opus Atlas Shrugged in 1957.
These philosophical novels embodied themes she then developed in
non-fiction form in a series of essays and books written in the 1960s
and 1970s.
Born in St. Petersburg, Russia, on February 2, 1905, Rand was raised
in a middle-class family. As a child, she loved story-telling, and she
decided at age nine to become a writer. In school showed academic
promise, particularly in mathematics. Her family was devastated by the
communist revolution of 1917, both by the social upheavals that the
revolution and the ensuing civil war brought and by her father's
pharmacy's being confiscated by the Soviets. The family moved to the
Crimea to recover financially and to escape the harshness of life the
revolution brought to St. Petersburg. They later returned to Petrograd
(the new name given to St. Petersburg by the Soviets), where Rand was
to attend university.
At the University of Petrograd, Rand concentrated her studies on
history, with secondary focuses on philosophy and literature. At
university, she was repelled by the dominance of communist ideas and
strong-arm tactics that suppressed free inquiry and discussion. As a
youth, she had been repelled by the communists' political program, and
now an adult, she was also more fully aware of the destructive effects
that the revolution had had on Russian society more broadly.
Having studied American history and politics in university, and having
long been an admirer of Western plays, music, and movies, she became
an admirer of America's individualism, its vigor, and its optimism,
seeing it as the opposite of Russian collectivism, decay, and gloom.
Not believing, however, that she would be free under the Soviet system
to write the kinds of books she wanted to write, she resolved to leave
Russia and go to America.
Rand graduated from the University of Petrograd in 1924. She then
enrolled at the State Institute for Cinema Arts in order to study
screen writing. In 1925, she finally received permission from the
Soviet authorities to leave the country in order to visit relatives in
the United States. Officially, her visit was to be brief; Rand,
however, had already decided not to return to the Soviet Union.
After several stops in western European cities, Rand arrived in New
York City in February 1926. From New York, she traveled on to Chicago,
Illinois, where she spent the next six months living with relatives,
learning English, and developing ideas for stories and movies. She had
decided to become a screenwriter, and, having received an extension to
her visa, she left for Hollywood, California.
On Rand's second day in Hollywood, an event occurred that was worthy
of her dramatic fiction and one that had a major impact on her future.
She was spotted by Cecil B. DeMille, one of Hollywood's leading
directors, while she was standing at the gate of his studio. She had
recognized him as he was passing by in his car, and he had noticed her
staring at him. He stopped to ask why she was staring, and Rand
explained that she had recently arrived from Russia, that she had long
been passionate about Hollywood movies, and that she dreamed of being
a screen writer. DeMille was then working on "The King of Kings," and
gave her a ride to his movie set and signed her on as an extra. Then,
during her second week at DeMille's studio, another significant event
occurred: Rand met Frank O'Connor, a young actor also working as an
extra. Rand and O'Connor were married in 1929, and they remained
married for fifty years until his death in 1979.
Rand also worked for DeMille as a reader of scripts, and struggled
financially while working on her own writing. She also held a variety
of non-writing jobs until in 1932 she was able to sell her first
screenplay, "Red Pawn," to Universal Studios. Also in 1932 her first
stage play, "Night of January 16th," was produced in Hollywood and
later on Broadway.
Rand had been working for years on her first significant novel, We the
Living, and finished it in 1933. However, for several years it was
rejected by various publishers, until in 1936 it was published by
Macmillan in the U.S. and Cassell in England. Rand described We the
Living as the most autobiographical of her novels, its theme being the
brutality of life under communist rule in Russia. We the Living did
not receive a positive reaction from American reviewers and
intellectuals. It was published in the 1930s, a decade sometimes
called the "Red Decade," during which American intellectuals were
often pro-Communist and respectful and admiring of the Soviet
experiment.
Rand's next major project was The Fountainhead, which she had begun to
work on in 1935. While the theme of We the Living was political, the
theme of The Fountainhead was ethical, focusing on individualist
themes of independence and integrity. The novel's hero, the architect
Howard Roark, is Rand's first embodiment of her ideal man, the man who
lives on a principled and heroic scale of achievement.
As with We the Living, Rand had difficulties getting The Fountainhead
published. Twelve publishers rejected it before being published by
Bobbs-Merrill in 1943. Again not well received by reviewers and
intellectuals, the novel nonetheless became a best-seller, primarily
through word-of-mouth recommendation. The Fountainhead made Rand
famous as an exponent of individualist ideas, and its continuing to
sell well brought her financial security. Warner Brothers produced a
movie version of the novel in 1949, starring Gary Cooper and Patricia
Neal, for which Rand wrote the screenplay.
In 1946, Rand began work on her most ambitious novel, Atlas Shrugged.
At the time she was working part-time as a screenwriter for producer
Hal Wallis. In 1951 she and her husband moved to New York City, where
she began to work full-time on Atlas. Published by Random House in
1957, Atlas Shrugged is her most complete expression of her literary
and philosophical vision. Dramatized in the form of a mystery story
about a man who stopped the motor of the world, the plot and
characters embody the political and ethical themes first developed in
We the Living and The Fountainhead, and integrates them into a
comprehensive philosophy including metaphysics, epistemology,
economics, and the psychology of love and sex.
Atlas Shrugged was an immediate best-seller and Rand's last work of
fiction. Her novels had expressed philosophical themes, although Rand
considered herself primarily a novelist and only secondarily a
philosopher. The creation of plots and characters and the
dramatization of achievements and conflicts were her central purposes
in writing fiction, rather than presenting an abstracted and didactic
set of philosophical theses.
The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, however, had attracted to Rand
many readers who were strongly interested in the philosophical ideas
the novels embodied and in pursuing them further. Among the earliest
of those with whom Rand became associated and who later became
prominent were psychologist Nathaniel Branden and economist Alan
Greenspan, later Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Her interactions
with these and several other key individuals were partly responsible
for Rand's turning from fiction to non-fiction writing in order to
develop her philosophy more systematically.
From 1962 until 1976, Rand wrote and lectured on her philosophy, now
named "Objectivism." Her essays were during this period were mostly
published in a series of periodicals, The Objectivist Newsletter,
published from 1962 to 1965, the larger periodical The Objectivist,
published from 1966 to 1971, and then The Ayn Rand Letter, published
from 1971 to 1976. The essays written for these periodicals form the
core material for a series of nine non-fiction books published during
Rand's lifetime. Those books develop Rand's philosophy in all its
major categories and apply it to cultural issues. Perhaps the most
significant of the books are The Virtue of Selfishness, which develops
her ethical theory, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, devoted to
political and economic theory, Introduction to Objectivist
Epistemology, a systematic presentation of her theory of concepts, and
The Romantic Manifesto, a theory of aesthetics.
During the 1960s Rand's most significant professional relationship was
with Nathaniel Branden. Branden, author of The Psychology of
Self-Esteem and later known as a leader in the self-esteem movement in
psychology, wrote many essays on philosophical and psychological
topics that were published in Rand's books and periodicals. He was the
founder and head of the Nathaniel Branden Institute, the leading
Objectivist institution of the 1960s. Based in New York City, N.B.I.
published with Rand's sanction numerous Objectivist periodicals and
pamphlets, and gave many series of lectures live in New York which
were then distributed on tape around the United States and the rest of
the world. The rapid growth of N.B.I. and the Objectivist movement
came to a halt in 1968 when, for both professional and personal
reasons, Rand and Branden parted ways.
Rand continued to write and lecture consistently until she stopped
publishing The Ayn Rand Letter in 1976. Thereafter she wrote and
lectured less as her husband's health declined, leading to his death
in 1979, and as her own health began to decline. Rand died on March 6,
1982, in her New York City apartment.
2. Rand's Ethical Theory: The Virtue of Selfishness
The provocative title of Ayn Rand's The Virtue of Selfishness matches
an equally provocative thesis about ethics. Traditional ethics has
always been suspicious of self interest, praising acts that are
selfless in intent and calling amoral or immoral acts that are
motivated by self interest. A self-interested person, on the
traditional view, will not consider the interests of others and so
will slight or harm those interests in the pursuit of his own.
Rand's view is that the exact opposite is true: self-interest,
properly understood, is the standard of morality and selflessness is
the deepest immorality.
Self interest rightly understood, according to Rand, is to see oneself
as an end in oneself. That is to say that one's own life and happiness
are one's highest values, and that one does not exist as a servant or
slave to the interests of others. Nor do others exist as servants or
slaves to one's own interests. Each person's own life and happiness is
his ultimate end. Self interest rightly understood also entails
self-responsibility: one's life is one's own, and so is the
responsibility for sustaining and enhancing it. It is up to each of us
to determine what values our lives require, how best to achieve those
values, and to act to achieve those values.
Rand's ethic of self interest is integral to her advocacy of classical
liberalism. Classical liberalism, more often called "libertarianism"
in the 20th century, is the view that individuals should be free to
pursue their own interests. This implies, politically, that
governments should be limited to protecting each individual's freedom
to do so. In other words, the moral legitimacy of self interest
implies that individuals have rights to their lives, their liberties,
their property, and the pursuit of their own happiness, and that the
purpose of government is to protect those rights. Economically,
leaving individuals free to pursue their own interests implies in turn
that only a capitalist or free market economic system is moral: free
individuals will use their time, money, and other property as they see
fit, and will interact and trade voluntarily with others to mutual
advantage.
a. Reason and Ethics
Fundamentally, the means by which we live our lives as humans is
reason. Our capacity for reason is what enables us to survive and
flourish. We are not born knowing what is good for us; that is
learned. Nor are we born knowing how to achieve what is good for us;
that too is learned. It is by reason that we learn what is food and
what is poison, what animals are useful or dangerous to us, how to
make tools, what forms of social organization are fruitful, and so on.
Thus Rand advocates rational self interest: one's interests are not
whatever one happens to feel like; rather it is by reason that one
identifies what is to one's interest and what isn't. By the use of
reason one takes into account all of the factors one can identify,
projects the consequences of potential courses of action, and adopts
principled policies of action.
The principled policies a person should adopt are called virtues. A
virtue is an acquired character trait; it results from identifying a
policy as good and committing to acting consistently in terms of that
policy.
One such virtue is rationality: having identified the use of reason as
fundamentally good, being committed to acting in accordance with
reason is the virtue of rationality. Another virtue is productiveness:
given that the values one needs to survive must be produced, being
committed to producing those values is the virtue of productiveness.
Another is honesty: given that facts are facts and that one's life
depends on knowing and acting in accordance with the facts, being
committed to awareness of the facts is the virtue of honesty.
Independence and integrity are also core virtues for Rand's account of
self interest. Given that one must think and act by one's own efforts,
being committed to the policy of independent action is a virtue. And
given that one must both identify what is to one's interests and act
to achieve them, a policy of being committed to acting on the basis of
one's beliefs is the virtue of integrity. The opposite policy of
believing one thing and doing another is of course the vice of
hypocrisy; hypocrisy is a policy of self-destruction, on Rand's view.
Justice is another core self-interested virtue: justice, on Rand's
account, means a policy of judging people, including oneself,
according to their value and acting accordingly. The opposite policy
of giving to people more or less than they deserve is injustice. The
final virtue on Rand's list of core virtues is pride, the policy of
"moral ambitiousness," in Rand's words. This means a policy of being
committed to making oneself be the best one can be, of shaping one's
character to the highest level possible.
The moral person, in summary, on Rand's account, is someone who acts
and is committed to acting in his best self-interest. It is by living
the morality of self interest that one survives, flourishes, and
achieves happiness.
This account of self interest is currently a minority position. The
contrasting view typically pits self interest against morality,
holding that one is moral only to the extent that one sacrifices one's
self interest for the sake of others or, more moderately, to the
extent one acts primarily with regard to the interests of others. For
example, standard versions of morality will hold that one is moral to
the extent one sets aside one's own interests in order to serve God,
or the weak and the poor, or society as a whole. On these accounts,
the interests of God, the poor, or society as a whole are held to be
of greater moral significance that one's own, and so accordingly one's
interests should be sacrificed when necessary. These ethics of
selflessness thus believe that one should see oneself fundamentally as
a servant, as existing to serve the interests of others, not one's
own. "Selfless service to others" or "selfless sacrifice" are stock
phrases indicating these accounts' view of appropriate motivation and
action.
The core difference between Rand's self interest view and the selfless
view can be seen in the reason why most advocates of selflessness
think self interest is dangerous: conflicts of interest.
b. Conflicts of Interest
Traditional ethics takes conflicts of interest to be fundamental to
the human condition, and takes ethics to be the solution: basic
ethical principles are to tell us whose interests should be sacrificed
in order to resolve the conflicts. If there is, for example, a
fundamental conflict between what God wants and what humans naturally
want, then religious ethics will make fundamental the principle that
human wants should be sacrificed for God's. If there's a fundamental
conflict between what society needs and what individuals want, then
some versions of secular ethics will make fundamental the principle
that the individual's wants should be sacrificed for society's.
Taking conflicts of interest to be fundamental almost always stems
from one of two beliefs: that human nature is fundamentally
destructive or that economic resources are scarce. If human nature is
fundamentally destructive, then humans are naturally in conflict with
each other. Many ethical philosophies start from this premise – for
example, Plato's myth of Gyges, Jewish and Christian accounts of
Original Sin, or Freud's account of the id. If what individuals
naturally want to do to each other is rape, steal, and kill, then in
order to have society these individual desires need to be sacrificed.
Consequently, a basic principle of ethics will be to urge individuals
to suppress their natural desires so that society can exist. In other
words, self interest is the enemy, and must be sacrificed for others.
If economic resources are scarce, then there is not enough to go
around. This scarcity then puts human beings in fundamental conflict
with each other: for one individual's need to be satisfied, another's
must be sacrificed. Many ethical philosophies begin with this premise.
For example, followers of Thomas Malthus's theory that population
growth outstrips growth in the food supply fall into this category.
Karl Marx's account of capitalist society is that brutal competition
leads to the exploitation of some by others. Garret Hardin's famous
use of the lifeboat analogy asks us to imagine that society is like a
lifeboat with more people that its resources can support. And so in
order to solve the destructive competition the lack of resources leads
us to, a basic principle of ethics will be to urge individuals to
sacrifice their interests in obtaining more (or even some) so that
others may obtain more (or some) and society can exist peacefully. In
others words, in a situation of scarcity self interest is the enemy
and must be sacrificed for others.
Rand rejects both the scarce resources and destructive human nature
premises. Human beings are not born in sin or with destructive
desires; nor do they necessarily acquire them in the course of growing
to maturity. Instead one is born tabula rasa ("blank slate"), and
through one's choices and actions one acquires one's character traits
and habits. As Rand phrased it, "Man is a being of self-made soul."
Having chronic desires to steal, rape, or kill others are the result
of mistaken development and the acquisition of bad habits, just as are
chronic laziness or the habit of eating too much junk food. And just
as one is not born lazy but can by one's choices develop oneself into
a person of vigor or sloth, one is not born anti-social but can by
one's choices develop oneself into a person of cooperativeness or
conflict.
Nor are resources scarce in any fundamental way, according to Rand. By
the use of reason, humans can discover new resources and how to use
existing resources more efficiently, including recycling where
appropriate and making productive processes more efficient. Humans
have for example continually discovered and developed new energy
resources, from animals to wood to coal to oil to nuclear to solar;
and there is no end in sight to this process. At any given moment, the
available resources are a fixed amount, but over time the stock of
resources are and have been constantly expanding.
Because humans are rational they can produce an ever-expanding number
of goods, and so human interests do not fundamentally conflict with
each other. Instead Rand holds that the exact opposite is true: since
humans can and should be productive, human interests are deeply in
harmony with each other. For example, my producing more corn is in
harmony with your producing more peas, for by our both being
productive and trading with each other we are both better off. It is
to your interest that I be successful in producing more corn, just as
it is to my interest that you be successful in producing more peas.
Conflicts of interest do exist within a narrower scope of focus. For
example, in the immediate present available resources are more fixed,
and so competition for those resources results, and competition
produces winners and losers. Economic competition, however, is a
broader form of cooperation, a way socially to allocate resources
without resorting to physical force and violence. By competition,
resources are allocated efficiently and peacefully, and in the long
run more resources are produced. Thus, a competitive economic system
is in the self interest of all of us.
Accordingly, Rand argues that her ethic of self interest is the basis
for personal happiness and free and prosperous societies.
3. Rand's Influence
The impact of Rand's ideas is difficult to measure, but it has been
great. All of the books she published during her lifetime are still in
print, have sold more than twenty million copies, and continue to sell
hundreds of thousands of copies each year. A survey jointly conducted
by the Library of Congress and the Book of the Month Club early in the
1990s asked readers to name the book that had most influenced their
lives: Atlas Shrugged was second only to the Bible. Excerpts from
Rand's works are regularly reprinted in college textbooks and
anthologies, and several volumes have been published posthumously
containing her early writings, journals, and letters. Those inspired
by her ideas have published books in many academic fields and founded
several institutes. Noteworthy among these are the Cato Institute,
based in Washington, D.C., the leading libertarian think tank in the
world. Rand, along with Nobel Prize-winners Friedrich Hayek and Milton
Friedman, was highly instrumental in attracting generations of
individuals to the libertarian movement. Also noteworthy are the Ayn
Rand Institute, founded in 1985 by philosopher Leonard Peikoff and
based in California, and The Objectivist Center, founded in 1990 by
philosopher David Kelley and based in New York.
4. References and Further Reading
* Binswanger, Harry. The Biological Basis of Teleological
Concepts. Los Angeles, CA: A.R.I. Press, 1990.
o Written by a philosopher, this is a scholarly work focused
on the connection between biology and the concepts at the roots of
ethics.
* Branden, Nathaniel. The Psychology of Self-Esteem. Los Angeles:
Nash Publishing, 1969.
* Branden, Nathaniel, and Barbara Branden. Who Is Ayn Rand? New
York: Random House, 1962.
o This book contains three essays on Objectivism's moral
philosophy, its connection to psychological theory, and a literary
study of Rand's novel methods. It contains an additional biographical
essay, tracing Rand's life from birth up until her mid-50s.
* Hessen, Robert. In Defense of the Corporation. Stanford, CA:
Hoover Institution, 1979.
o An economic historian, Hessen argues and defends from an
Objectivist perspective the moral and legal status of the corporate
form of business organizations.
* Kelley, David. The Evidence of the Senses. Baton Rouge: L.S.U.
Press, 1986.
o Written by a philosopher, this is a scholarly work in
epistemology, focusing on the foundational role the senses play in
human knowledge.
* Mayhew, Robert. Ayn Rand's Marginalia. New Milford, CT: Second
Renaissance Books, 1995.
o This volume contains Rand's critical comments on over
twenty thinkers, including Friedrich Hayek, C. S. Lewis, and Immanuel
Kant. Edited by a philosopher, the volume contains facsimiles of the
original texts with Rand's comments on facing pages.
* Peikoff, Leonard. The Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in
America. New York: Stein & Day, 1982.
o A scholarly work in the philosophy of history, arguing
Objectivism's theses about the role of philosophical ideas in history
and applying them to explaining the rise of National Socialism.
* Peikoff, Leonard. Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New
York: Dutton, 1991.
o This is the first comprehensive overview of all aspects of
Objectivist philosophy, written by the philosopher most close to Rand
during her lifetime.
* Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. Random House, 1957.
o Rand's magnum opus of fiction.
* Rand, Ayn.Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. New American Library, 1967.
o A collection of twenty of Rand's essays on politics,
history, and economics. Also includes two essays by psychologist
Nathaniel Branden, three by economist Alan Greenspan, and one by
historian Robert Hessen.
* Rand, Ayn. The Fountainhead. Bobbs-Merrill, 1943.
o The novel of individualism, independence, and integrity
that made Rand famous.
* Rand, Ayn. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. New
American Library, 1979.
o Rand's theory of concept-formation. Also includes an essay
by philosopher Leonard Peikoff on the analytic/synthetic distinction.
* Rand, Ayn. Philosophy: Who Needs It. Bobbs-Merrill, 1982.
o A collection of Rand's essays on the nature and
significance of philosophy.
* Rand, Ayn.The Romantic Manifesto. World Publishing, 1969.
Paperback edition: New American Library, 1971.
o A collection of Rand's essays on philosophy of art and aesthetics.
* Rand, Ayn. The Virtue of Selfishness. New American Library, 1964.
o A collection of fourteen of Rand's essays on ethics. Also
includes five essays by psychologist Nathaniel Branden.
* Rasmussen, Douglas and Douglas Den Uyl, editors. The Philosophic
Thought of Ayn Rand. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1984.
o A collection of scholarly essays by philosophers,
defending and criticizing various aspects of Objectivism's
metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and politics.
* Reisman, George. Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics. Ottawa,
IL: Jameson Books, 1996.
o A scholarly work by an economist, developing capitalist
economic theory and connecting it to Objectivist philosophy.
* Sciabarra, Chris Matthew. Ayn Rand, The Russian Radical.
University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
o A work in history of philosophy, this book attempts to
trace the influence upon Rand's thinking of dialectical approaches to
philosophy prevalent in 19th century Europe and Russia. Also an
introduction and overview of the major branches of Objectivist
philosophy.
No comments:
Post a Comment